Last updated: 2018-08-04
workflowr checks: (Click a bullet for more information) ✔ R Markdown file: up-to-date
Great! Since the R Markdown file has been committed to the Git repository, you know the exact version of the code that produced these results.
✔ Environment: empty
Great job! The global environment was empty. Objects defined in the global environment can affect the analysis in your R Markdown file in unknown ways. For reproduciblity it’s best to always run the code in an empty environment.
✔ Seed:
set.seed(20180609)
The command set.seed(20180609)
was run prior to running the code in the R Markdown file. Setting a seed ensures that any results that rely on randomness, e.g. subsampling or permutations, are reproducible.
✔ Session information: recorded
Great job! Recording the operating system, R version, and package versions is critical for reproducibility.
✔ Repository version: 312476b
wflow_publish
or wflow_git_commit
). workflowr only checks the R Markdown file, but you know if there are other scripts or data files that it depends on. Below is the status of the Git repository when the results were generated:
Ignored files:
Ignored: .DS_Store
Ignored: .Rhistory
Ignored: .Rproj.user/
Ignored: data/
Ignored: docs/.DS_Store
Ignored: docs/images/.DS_Store
Ignored: docs/images/.Rapp.history
Ignored: output/.DS_Store
Ignored: output/.Rapp.history
Ignored: output/MASHvFLASHgtex/.DS_Store
Ignored: output/MASHvFLASHsims/.DS_Store
Ignored: output/MASHvFLASHsims/backfit/.DS_Store
Ignored: output/MASHvFLASHsims/backfit/.Rapp.history
Untracked files:
Untracked: docs/figure/OHFvTop20.Rmd/
Unstaged changes:
Modified: code/gtexanalysis.R
Note that any generated files, e.g. HTML, png, CSS, etc., are not included in this status report because it is ok for generated content to have uncommitted changes.
File | Version | Author | Date | Message |
---|---|---|---|---|
html | 5401954 | Jason Willwerscheid | 2018-08-04 | Build site. |
Rmd | b2aa853 | Jason Willwerscheid | 2018-08-04 | wflow_publish(c(“analysis/MASHvTop20.Rmd”, |
html | 592a427 | Jason Willwerscheid | 2018-08-03 | Build site. |
Rmd | 0d2b9b5 | Jason Willwerscheid | 2018-08-03 | wflow_publish(c(“analysis/index.Rmd”, “analysis/MASHvTop20.Rmd”)) |
html | 9867668 | Jason Willwerscheid | 2018-08-03 | Build site. |
Rmd | 5f31e16 | Jason Willwerscheid | 2018-08-03 | wflow_publish(c(“analysis/index.Rmd”, “analysis/MASHvTop20.Rmd”)) |
This analysis compares the MASH fit to the “Top 20” fit. See here for fitting details and here for an introduction to the plots.
library(mashr)
Loading required package: ashr
devtools::load_all("/Users/willwerscheid/GitHub/flashr/")
Loading flashr
gtex <- readRDS(gzcon(url("https://github.com/stephenslab/gtexresults/blob/master/data/MatrixEQTLSumStats.Portable.Z.rds?raw=TRUE")))
strong <- t(gtex$strong.z)
fpath <- "./output/MASHvFLASHgtex2/"
m_final <- readRDS(paste0(fpath, "m.rds"))
fl_final <- readRDS(paste0(fpath, "Top20.rds"))
m_lfsr <- t(get_lfsr(m_final))
m_pm <- t(get_pm(m_final))
all_fl_lfsr <- readRDS(paste0(fpath, "fllfsr.rds"))
fl_lfsr <- all_fl_lfsr[[4]]
fl_pm <- flash_get_fitted_values(fl_final)
missing.tissues <- c(7, 8, 19, 20, 24, 25, 31, 34, 37)
gtex.colors <- read.table("https://github.com/stephenslab/gtexresults/blob/master/data/GTExColors.txt?raw=TRUE", sep = '\t', comment.char = '')[-missing.tissues, 2]
OHF.colors <- c("tan4", "tan3")
zero.colors <- c("black", gray.colors(19, 0.2, 0.9),
gray.colors(17, 0.95, 1))
plot_test <- function(n, lfsr, pm, method_name) {
plot(strong[, n], pch=1, col="black", xlab="", ylab="", cex=0.6,
ylim=c(min(c(strong[, n], 0)), max(c(strong[, n], 0))),
main=paste0("Test #", n, "; ", method_name))
size = rep(0.6, 44)
shape = rep(15, 44)
signif <- lfsr[, n] <= .05
shape[signif] <- 17
size[signif] <- 1.35 - 15 * lfsr[signif, n]
size <- pmin(size, 1.2)
points(pm[, n], pch=shape, col=as.character(gtex.colors), cex=size)
abline(0, 0)
}
plot_ohf_v_ohl_loadings <- function(n, ohf_fit, ohl_fit, ohl_name,
legend_pos = "bottomright") {
ohf <- abs(ohf_fit$EF[n, ] * apply(abs(ohf_fit$EL), 2, max))
ohl <- -abs(ohl_fit$EF[n, ] * apply(abs(ohl_fit$EL), 2, max))
data <- rbind(c(ohf, rep(0, length(ohl) - 45)),
c(ohl[1:45], rep(0, length(ohf) - 45),
ohl[46:length(ohl)]))
colors <- c("black",
as.character(gtex.colors),
OHF.colors,
zero.colors[1:(length(ohl) - 45)])
x <- barplot(data, beside=T, col=rep(colors, each=2),
main=paste0("Test #", n, " loadings"),
legend.text = c("OHF", ohl_name),
args.legend = list(x = legend_pos, bty = "n", pch="+-",
fill=NULL, border="white"))
text(x[2*(46:47) - 1], min(data) / 10,
labels=as.character(1:2), cex=0.4)
text(x[2*(48:ncol(data))], max(data) / 10,
labels=as.character(1:(length(ohl) - 45)), cex=0.4)
}
compare_methods <- function(lfsr1, lfsr2, pm1, pm2) {
res <- list()
res$first_not_second <- find_A_not_B(lfsr1, lfsr2)
res$lg_first_not_second <- find_large_A_not_B(lfsr1, lfsr2)
res$second_not_first <- find_A_not_B(lfsr2, lfsr1)
res$lg_second_not_first <- find_large_A_not_B(lfsr2, lfsr1)
res$diff_pms <- find_overall_pm_diff(pm1, pm2)
return(res)
}
# Find tests where many conditions are significant according to
# method A but not according to method B.
find_A_not_B <- function(lfsrA, lfsrB) {
select_tests(colSums(lfsrA <= 0.05 & lfsrB > 0.05))
}
# Find tests where many conditions are highly significant according to
# method A but are not significant according to method B.
find_large_A_not_B <- function(lfsrA, lfsrB) {
select_tests(colSums(lfsrA <= 0.01 & lfsrB > 0.05))
}
find_overall_pm_diff <- function(pmA, pmB, n = 4) {
pm_diff <- colSums((pmA - pmB)^2)
return(order(pm_diff, decreasing = TRUE)[1:4])
}
# Get at least four (or min_n) "top" tests.
select_tests <- function(colsums, min_n = 4) {
n <- 45
n_tests <- 0
while (n_tests < min_n && n > 0) {
n <- n - 1
n_tests <- sum(colsums >= n)
}
return(which(colsums >= n))
}
As in the previous analysis, the most common case involves a combination of a small equal effect and a large unique effect. Some typical examples follow.
# mash.v.top20 <- compare_methods(fl_lfsr, m_lfsr, fl_pm, m_pm)
identical.plus.unique <- c(2184, 4752, 10000, 13684)
par(mfrow=c(1, 2))
for (n in identical.plus.unique) {
plot_test(n, fl_lfsr, fl_pm, "Top 20")
plot_test(n, m_lfsr, m_pm, "MASH")
}
Version | Author | Date |
---|---|---|
9867668 | Jason Willwerscheid | 2018-08-03 |
Version | Author | Date |
---|---|---|
9867668 | Jason Willwerscheid | 2018-08-03 |
Version | Author | Date |
---|---|---|
9867668 | Jason Willwerscheid | 2018-08-03 |
Version | Author | Date |
---|---|---|
9867668 | Jason Willwerscheid | 2018-08-03 |
The most typical case here has MASH finding a significant equal effect, while FLASH finds a significant unique effect and an insignificant equal effect. In each of the following tests, there is a single outlying effect (with a raw \(z\)-score of around 4 or 5), which FLASH identifies as unique but which MASH “assigns” to the equal effect (or rather, to the data-driven covariance structure described in the previous analysis). Roughly, the other observations borrow strength from the outlying observation in MASH but not in FLASH.
par(mfrow=c(1, 2))
shrink.unique <- c(1115, 5174, 8578, 9928)
for (n in shrink.unique) {
plot_test(n, fl_lfsr, fl_pm, "OHF")
plot_test(n, m_lfsr, m_pm, "MASH")
}
Version | Author | Date |
---|---|---|
9867668 | Jason Willwerscheid | 2018-08-03 |
Version | Author | Date |
---|---|---|
9867668 | Jason Willwerscheid | 2018-08-03 |
Version | Author | Date |
---|---|---|
9867668 | Jason Willwerscheid | 2018-08-03 |
Version | Author | Date |
---|---|---|
9867668 | Jason Willwerscheid | 2018-08-03 |
The following examples differ from the examples in the previous analysis in that all effect sizes are large. As a result, the MASH estimates do not coincide with the raw observations as neatly. Notice, for example, that in each case some of the MASH estimates are even larger than the observed effect sizes. This is because the posterior mixture weights are primarily concentrated on the ED_tPCA
matrices rather than on the simple_het
matrices (see here for a description of these matrices).
par(mfrow=c(1, 2))
diff.pms <- c(11467, 246, 6701)
for (n in diff.pms) {
plot_test(n, fl_lfsr, fl_pm, "OHF")
plot_test(n, m_lfsr, m_pm, "MASH")
}
Version | Author | Date |
---|---|---|
5401954 | Jason Willwerscheid | 2018-08-04 |
Version | Author | Date |
---|---|---|
5401954 | Jason Willwerscheid | 2018-08-04 |
Version | Author | Date |
---|---|---|
5401954 | Jason Willwerscheid | 2018-08-04 |
sessionInfo()
R version 3.4.3 (2017-11-30)
Platform: x86_64-apple-darwin15.6.0 (64-bit)
Running under: macOS High Sierra 10.13.6
Matrix products: default
BLAS: /Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Versions/3.4/Resources/lib/libRblas.0.dylib
LAPACK: /Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Versions/3.4/Resources/lib/libRlapack.dylib
locale:
[1] en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8/C/en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8
attached base packages:
[1] stats graphics grDevices utils datasets methods base
other attached packages:
[1] flashr_0.5-12 mashr_0.2-7 ashr_2.2-10
loaded via a namespace (and not attached):
[1] Rcpp_0.12.17 pillar_1.2.1 compiler_3.4.3
[4] git2r_0.21.0 plyr_1.8.4 workflowr_1.0.1
[7] R.methodsS3_1.7.1 R.utils_2.6.0 iterators_1.0.9
[10] tools_3.4.3 testthat_2.0.0 digest_0.6.15
[13] tibble_1.4.2 gtable_0.2.0 evaluate_0.10.1
[16] memoise_1.1.0 lattice_0.20-35 rlang_0.2.0
[19] Matrix_1.2-12 foreach_1.4.4 commonmark_1.4
[22] yaml_2.1.17 parallel_3.4.3 ebnm_0.1-12
[25] mvtnorm_1.0-7 xml2_1.2.0 withr_2.1.1.9000
[28] stringr_1.3.0 knitr_1.20 roxygen2_6.0.1.9000
[31] devtools_1.13.4 rprojroot_1.3-2 grid_3.4.3
[34] R6_2.2.2 rmarkdown_1.8 rmeta_3.0
[37] ggplot2_2.2.1 magrittr_1.5 whisker_0.3-2
[40] scales_0.5.0 backports_1.1.2 codetools_0.2-15
[43] htmltools_0.3.6 MASS_7.3-48 assertthat_0.2.0
[46] softImpute_1.4 colorspace_1.3-2 stringi_1.1.6
[49] lazyeval_0.2.1 munsell_0.4.3 doParallel_1.0.11
[52] pscl_1.5.2 truncnorm_1.0-8 SQUAREM_2017.10-1
[55] R.oo_1.21.0
This reproducible R Markdown analysis was created with workflowr 1.0.1